BECAUSE OF THE STAMMERING
Artículo de Shimon Peres en "Ha´aretz" del 6-11-2002
When the nation has people hungry for bread, the social issue
must be at the top of our agenda. But it is impossible to correct the social
situation without correcting the economy itself. As long as investments in
Israel are not renewed and tourists don't come back, as long as the flow of
capital out of Israel isn't stopped and budgets are disbursed according to
parochial demands, the economy will not recover. And as long as the security
situation is unstable, the basic conditions for social and economic
deterioration will not change.
Five conditions are necessary to correct this situation:
- There must be Palestinian cooperation in the war on terror. The Palestinians
will not agree to become collaborators and if we want their cooperation we have
to present them with a clear political horizon. That horizon is the vision in
President Bush's speech, accompanied by the Quartet's plan: A permanent solution
based on two states that live side by side. In my meetings with Palestinians a
few days ago, I made it clear that there is no chance Israel will accept the
Palestinian plan, just as there is no chance of the Palestinians accepting the
Israeli plan. The only way for both peoples is to accept the international
compromise supported now by almost all the world and by a majority of people in
both nations. Without international support, the Palestinians will not be able
to establish a state and Israel will find it difficult to attain peace. Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon says he accepts the Bush vision, but he is not ready to
bring that position to the government for approval. Stammering does not make
policy.
- An agreement with the Palestinians must - and can - be drawn up in such a way
that things are done simultaneously: a war on terror; negotiations for a
permanent solution; Palestinian governmental reforms. If we condition one
element on the other, everything will remain stuck, just as it has been stuck
for two years.
- New settlement construction must be frozen and we must announce that we are
ready to include removal of settlements in any permanent agreement, as proposed
by President Clinton at Camp David. The settlements have taken a heavy toll on
Israeli society. They have gobbled up budgets and made it difficult to draw a
map of peace or security for Israel.
- Sharon claims he agreed to the principles laid out in the Abu Ala-Peres
understandings. But he rejects the timetable as too short. In my opinion,
there's no time to waste. The levels of tension and terror in the region are so
high that the quicker we progress toward a permanent agreement the more all
sides will benefit.
- Within three or four years there will be a new Middle East or a nuclear Middle
East, swarming with various range missiles and terrorists in every corner. There
will be either a Middle East rife with fear, hostility and poverty or a Middle
East that will rid itself of the combination of modern weaponry and backward
economies. It could be a Middle East that will have to cooperate in
infrastructure, economic management and in industry and services based on new
technologies, as has happened in Europe, as is happening in China, India, Latin
America and elsewhere. Israel must be among the leaders of that new Middle East
and overcome the cynics and skeptics.
The right wing tried - and we tried to help it - to achieve peace, security and
economic growth. The effort failed because of stammering, hesitation,
procrastination and lost horizons. The mandate has gone back to the people and
the people must decide to escape social poverty and political failure.